- Reality -
Chapter 01 - from nothing to a system - page 02.
What comes first : matter, and as a result the space it takes up? Or space,
which allows the existance of matter within it? By matter i mean the elemental
building block of matter and by space i mean an amount of space that is big
enough to contain said elemental building block, thus defining an elemental
volume (under certain circumstances, see below). Let's also stick with a 3-dimensional system for now, although i will start
from a zero-dimensional system and work my way up to higher dimensions. A
chapter dedicated to multi-dimensional systems and realities will also mention
higher than 3-dimensional possibilities.
When starting from absolutely nothing, there's no matter - that's logical, but
there is no space either. The existance of space already defines the existance
of a system, unless said space is non-dimensional. How does space come into existance, then? If a system's existance does not
start with the birth of space, then maybe it does with the birth of matter.
Matter is defined as having a volume, it creates space into nothingness and thus
it creates a system, but again the question remains : how does matter come into
existance?
Space can already exist in the nothingness, but, only until matter has passed
through it, else it remains undefined and is non-dimensional. From the point in time
after matter has passed through it, onwards, it becomes part of the system this
matter belonged to and it will remain part of that system till it collapses. The
dimension of the matter will also determine what dimension the newly added space
will have from then onwards.
If nothingness filled with energy and non-dimensional space can still be defined
as nothingness, maybe this energy can be made into matter, but, as explained
earlier, one would need a system with a defined time vector in it. Perhaps
nothingness is defined as a system with it's time equal to zero, but then again
you already have a system while we're actually trying to figure out how a system
comes into existance. Can matter, space and energy then exist without the
presence of a time vector and would that make it then nothingness, where nothing
is defined, yet there is matter and space present? Is nothingness still defined
if its filled with non-dimensional systems, which can never interact with each
other as the nothingness in itself doesn't allow for distances between them to
be defined, nor does it allow for the time that is needed to cross said
undefined distance, to be defined, yet these non-dimensional systems may grow
into multi-dimensional systems and later on, realities?
I can't come up with an answer from either a pure scientific
astrophysical point of view or from a sci-fi point of view, nor even a fantasy
point of view, since each attempt to define the birth of existance relies on the
existance of other things, and with the existance of whatever this 'other thing'
may be, one needs at least a system to allow said 'other thing' to be there in
the first place. Thus my current attempts, based on logic and the non-existance
of infinity, are futile, to go from absolutely nothing to even the smallest bit of
something is not easy, to say at the least. Perhaps the understanding of what
nothingness really is (despite the fact it is not), is not enough to see what
kind of role nothingness itself plays in all this.
But perhaps there is a way around that. Imagine nothing...just nothing and
compare it to a pool of black water, systems that appear within it can be
compared to air bubbles that grow and eventually burst and dissapear. Said air
bubbles can only be created if we have an air supply somewhere in that pool, and
that supply is what i'm trying to discover in nothingness. Nothing is empty and
undefined, since any presence of a definition, turns nothing into something.
Perhaps at a point in the future, a very intelligent species may be able to
create a definition of what this nothingness is, explaining it in simple
understandable terms and that would actually destroy the existance of nothing,
since it's no longer nothing. Would the discovery of the complete and final
definition of true nothingness by a certain lifeform, living in a certain
reality, which is a bubble surrounded by nothingness, which in turn holds other
reality-bubbles and systems, destroy said nothingness and thus eliminate the
possibility of new systems ever being created from then on and on top of that,
place all existing systems and realities next to each other, or will it even
destroy all systems and realities?
Placing systems and/or realities next to each other holds dangers for the
survival of the systems, by placing them next to each other, there will be at
least 1 elemental unit of space of one system sitting next to at least one of
the other system, these may not be compatible (different dimensions, different
fundamental laws and elemental definitions), but there might be the possibility
that matter, energy and light is passed from one system to another, the
injection of other-dimensional matter, which has been subject to another time
vector and another set of fundamental laws and which has other elemental
attributes, will most likely be fatal to the reality residing in that system,
and may in turn result in a new reality based on the merged realities or may
result in the system collapsing and dissapearing. Although, within nothing,
distances are not defined, and as such there is no way to tell how far or close
system-bubbles are away from each other, but as the definition of a system
includes that it's borders are with nothingness, no 2 systems will ever touch,
nor will any communication, be it matter or energy transfered ever occur between
different systems, as long as nothingness is intact. Back to the image of the
pool : air bubbles can touch and will merge, even if they contain different
kinds of gasses, but we are comparing a perfect 3D system (the ppol) with the entirety of
everything with all its possibilities (nothingness), so the image of the pool is not
sufficient for this special example, but imagine in that case the entire pool
'collapsing' and just dissapearing instantly and at the same time all memories
of that pool dissapearing.
As such, the discovery of the definition of nothingness might mean the end of
everything, and although i think that lifeforms can decipher the fabric of the
limited-dimension reality they live in and eventually alter it, i doubt they
will ever have such power that they can control higher-dimensional realities,
the system that holds their reality or other realities or systems (more on
borders later).
So nothingness, altho it is purely nothing, must be so complex, that no lifeform
ever, no matter how advanced and intelligent, can understand nor define it. To
be so complex that it can never be understood, it must basically be infinite and
be able to be everything and nothing all at the same time, this means that all
possibilities exists within nothingness, making it truly infinite in every
possible way (i.e. an infinite number of ways). One of these possibilities
includes that there is truly nothing, another possibility may be that there are
several systems, some with realities in them. Yet another possibility may be
that a certain system with a reality suddenly stops existing. And so on, yet
this infinity of possibilities is not present within the systems and realities,
the border between a system and nothingness will also make sure that there's no
communication whatsoever possible between the two. If it were present, then
there would be the possibility that in one reality a definition (which is
infinite in itself) is in the making and eventually may be finished, although
unprobably, yet imaginable and thus possible, and thus may cause the end of
everything yet again. That fact makes nothingness an unstable entity.
The only influence that the nature of nothingness has on systems and/or
realities is on the entire system or reality as a whole, as the borders of it
will not allow the influence of nothingness' nature to pass through. As such,
the possibility that an entire system just stops existing, even if there's no
cause that comes from within that reality, is actually possible. And the
consequences for the reality -apart for the fact that its gone- are
non-existant, since they cannot be seen, felt, etc, since there is no system
that can do that, nor is there anyone within any reality that may have existed
within said system that can remember it. On top of that no-one in any other
system will ever know what happened since there's no communication possible
between different systems. It just stops existing and there are no consequences
to who or whatever at all, just like that system was never there in the first
place.
With this new -undefinable, non-existant- definition of nothingness, there might
be the possibility that matter and/or space comes into existance, and grows into
a new system-bubble within the nothingness.
Another possibility is to allow fluctuations and anomalies to exist within
nothingness (it's an unstable entity after all), which is a similar theory to allowing all posibilities to exist but
alot more limited. An example of such a fluctuation could be the sudden buildup
of energy in a non-dimensional amount of space, which can result in the creation
of matter, dimensions and a time vector. The remaining energy -if any- will
force the matter to move outwards, which in turn will create space where-ever
this matter goes, as well as the limited amount of space present initially
before the sudden appearance of all this matter, which will try to push the
matter out. The amount of energy that is built up will determine the amount of
matter and light that can be created and the amount of energy that's left to
push the matter outwards, this amount will be constant for the entire lifetime
of the system that's just been created and will determine if the system is ever
possible to grow out into a reality.
But this theory, as well as the big bang theory starts with a singularity, from
which the actual system and reality grows. Current physic laws do not apply
since the circumstances in a singularity are so extreme, however that may be
because these physic laws are not correct, not advanced enough or simply not
capable of documenting whatever can happen in such a singularity and there might
be a point in the future where updated laws of physics can describe what is
going on in any singularity, though that is unlikely since there's no-one to
actually witness what happens and data may be lost forever to the reality that
gets formed afterwards.
Read on...
back to page 1...
Chapter 00...
Warning: include(../../banners/banners.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/nulllvo/public_html/svc/misc/reality/reality01_02.htm on line 198
Warning: include(../../banners/banners.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/nulllvo/public_html/svc/misc/reality/reality01_02.htm on line 198
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '../../banners/banners.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/nulllvo/public_html/svc/misc/reality/reality01_02.htm on line 198